free advice is adjusted to market price

Last week the Web site UsedWinnipeg.com ran an advertisement headlined “Native Extraction Service” with a photograph of three young Native boys. The service offered to round up and remove First Nations youth like wild animals, and “relocate them to their habitat.”

The text of the ad read: “Have you ever had the experience of getting home to find those pesky little buggers hanging outside your home, in the back alley or on the corner??? Well fear no more, with my service I will simply do a harmless relocation. With one phone call I will arrive and net the pest, load them in the containment unit (pickup truck) and then relocate them to their habit.”

They’re talking about our children.

As much as the world has changed for indigenous people in good ways, there are still many violent and hateful folks out there who seek to harm us, and we must condemn them in print and in action, and we must do this together.

It is easy to feel defensive if you’re using stereotypical materials. It may feel like a personal attack on your decisions. Please know that I view us all as products of a society that “did this” to us all—-not in an intentionally harmful way—-but in an unthinking way. There is no one place to lay blame for this massive lack-of-knowing, and laying blame is not the purpose of my writing on this blog.

Instead, my purpose is to provide a different perspective on American Indians as taught by books, schools, and society. I ask you to set aside that book, or that lesson plan, or that bulletin board display, and provide your students with solid information about American Indians.

curate:

this was pretty good.
News & Events « AIS, College of LAS, University of Illinois

Damn it, I really wanted to go to this.

curate:

this was pretty good.

News & Events « AIS, College of LAS, University of Illinois

Damn it, I really wanted to go to this.

sexartandpolitics:

abbyjean:

THE UNITED STATES? Bill Rankin, 2003
American Indian reservations are sovereign areas with a state-to-state relationship to the US Congress, but congressional authority overrides tribal law. Reservations are generally not subject to state jurisdiction. What mapping convention corresponds to this political arrangement? One could make a case that reservations should be drawn as part of the United States, but should the Hopi reservation be shown as part of Arizona?
At stake here is the European definition of nation-state sovereignty, which implies a close (and, ideally, consensual) relation between an area on a map and the governance of its inhabitants. It is not simply that a European-style map has a hard time representing the sovereignty rights (or claims) of indigenous peoples; rather, such relations are a priori impossible to depict on a typical map.

This just confirmed that the next book I read will be The Third Space of Sovereignty: The Postcolonial Politics of U.S.-Indigenous Relations.

sexartandpolitics:

abbyjean:

THE UNITED STATES? Bill Rankin, 2003

American Indian reservations are sovereign areas with a state-to-state relationship to the US Congress, but congressional authority overrides tribal law. Reservations are generally not subject to state jurisdiction. What mapping convention corresponds to this political arrangement? One could make a case that reservations should be drawn as part of the United States, but should the Hopi reservation be shown as part of Arizona?

At stake here is the European definition of nation-state sovereignty, which implies a close (and, ideally, consensual) relation between an area on a map and the governance of its inhabitants. It is not simply that a European-style map has a hard time representing the sovereignty rights (or claims) of indigenous peoples; rather, such relations are a priori impossible to depict on a typical map.

This just confirmed that the next book I read will be The Third Space of Sovereignty: The Postcolonial Politics of U.S.-Indigenous Relations.

unburyingthelead:

curate:dominickbrady:indigen:

From Finding Dulcinea:

On paper, the situation sounds good: Based on a 1787 agreement between tribes and the United States government, the U.S. has an obligation to provide American Indians with free health care on reservations.

But that’s not how it works, reports the Associated Press. Roughly one-third more is spent per capita on health care for felons in federal prison, according to 2005 data referenced by the AP. The system’s ineffectiveness has yielded a common refrain on reservations of “don’t get sick after June,” because that‘s when federal funds run out.

This is why some tribes are buying clinics from the U.S. government and administering them themselves as the public property of their nation.