free advice is adjusted to market price

Chicago Workers’ Collaborative  is an Illinois non-profit organization that unites low-wage workers so we can receive the proper respect and treatment in exchange for our important labor.  We educate about workplace rights, provide critical services to our members, and mobilize to gain full access to employment for all workers, especially immigrants and African Americans. The CWC presently is working on the following initiatives:

  • Collaborating with the Illinois Department of Labor and the Illinois Attorney General’s office to improve enforcement of state labor laws.
  • Growing the membership of our Chicago and Northwest Suburban Worker Service Centers by providing critical Assistance to our members.
  • Aiding our worker members to locate the best legal assistance for employment-related issues.
  • Working with law enforcement authorities in arresting the perpetrators and helping the victims of human traffiicking.
  • Bringing together African-American and Latino workers to end the criminalization of our people, including Comprehensive Immigration Reform, so we may all work and participate in our community as equals.
The Associated Press and other news outlets are referring to Forde as a “border activist.” While it is true that Forde was involved in various political efforts to restrict immigration, many of those efforts consisted of running around with guns, as part of a self-styled “Minuteman” group. When people do that kind of thing in other countries, taking up weapons in support of their particular causes, we tend to refer to them not as “activists,” but as “militants.” And then when they use the weapons to murder somebody, sometimes we call them “terrorists.

At the moment, if an employer successfully argues that a worker is treated as a family member – if they share meals with the family, for instance – they can be exempt from paying the minimum wage. “Employers are able to argue they don’t need to pay the worker a penny,” says Gibbs, “because they treat them so nicely. But it’s very clear workers don’t do this for a cultural exchange. They are just here to send remittances home.”


Anna (not her real name), an energetic 40-year-old, originally from the Philippines, says that implying that women leave their own families for anything less than a fair wage is an insult. “Childcare is work. It’s a big sacrifice. You don’t experience your own children growing up. I remember when I went home I made my daughter fried eggs – I didn’t know she only ever ate boiled eggs. I am their mother, but I am a stranger.” She made the choice because she was desperate to give her children a better life, she says.


According to Rosie Cox, author of The Servant Problem, there are more servants in the UK now than there were in Victorian times, because of the growth of childcare and the relatively low cost of employing a cleaner. Yet the rise in numbers has not improved the status of women who work in the home. “Domestic work is utterly undervalued and anyone who can do anything else does,” she says. “Workers can be treated as less than human – as though they are dirty and diseased, which raises massive questions about the way society treats tasks done by women.”

How domestic workers become slaves | Life and style | The Guardian (via bonesarecoralmade)

does cultural exchange have monetary value?  is culture a commodity such that it has value pegged to some gold (authentic) standard?

is familal relation a benefit that an employer can offer, on par with the value of women’s reproductive labor?

(via curate)

Privileged bodies, whose mobility is unrestricted worldwide, get to decide where capital goes, where factories are built, where coal is mined. In the wake of advanced, global capitalism, of course not everyone can move through the world freely, because if they did, what’s to stop them (us) from moving to places where wages are livable, land is unpolluted and resources are plentiful? Because at the end of the day, that’s what Western immigration laws are about: protecting access to centuries of amassed (stolen) wealth, and perpetuating a system wherein white bodies can move through the world at will, taking what they need.
Tassja, “Different Kind of Border Patrol” (via tart-tart) (via bonesarecoralmade) (via curate)
catbus:

Bors is consistently an awful cartoonist who trafficks in ‘my opponents are dumb and so goddamned crazy’. But this is a good cartoon; James Reasonably Suspicious is a great joke. Nice work cartoonist guy.

catbus:

Bors is consistently an awful cartoonist who trafficks in ‘my opponents are dumb and so goddamned crazy’. But this is a good cartoon; James Reasonably Suspicious is a great joke. Nice work cartoonist guy.

Hard to find even the Gallows Humor in this story, so maybe we won’t even try. Maybe it’s time to admit that large chunks of America are in the hands of unreconstructed racists and vulgar idiots, and that the popular election of a black man as president just might’ve pushed these furious, economically doomed old white people into a final rage that is going to end very, very badly. Ready? Here you go: An Arizona elementary school mural featuring the faces of kids who attend the school has been the subject of constant daytime drive-by racist screaming, from adults, as well as a radio talk-show campaign (by an actual city councilman, who has an AM talk-radio show) to remove the black student’s face, and now the school principal has ordered the faces of the Latino and Black students to be changed to Caucasian skin.

This is America, in 2010, and there’s a dozen more states and endless white-trash municipalities ready to Officially Adopt this same Official Racist Insanity.

From the Arizona Republic:

A group of artists has been asked to lighten the faces of children depicted in a giant public mural at a Prescott school. The project’s leader says he was ordered to lighten the skin tone after complaints about the children’s ethnicity ….

R.E. Wall, director of Prescott’s Downtown Mural Project, said he and other artists were subjected to slurs from motorists as they worked on the painting at one of the town’s most prominent intersections.

“We consistently, for two months, had people shouting racial slander from their cars,” Wall said. “We had children painting with us, and here come these yells of (epithet for Blacks) and (epithet for Hispanics).”

The children depicted on the mural, as we mentioned before but feel compelled to repeat, are little kids who go to the school — “a K-5 school with 380 students and the highest ethnic mix of any school in Prescott. Wall said thousands of town residents volunteered or donated to the project.”

And these children, for the past several months as this happy mural encouraging “green transportation” was being painted by local artists, have been treated to the city of Prescott’s finest citizens driving by and yelling “Nigger” and “Spic” at this school wall painted with pictures of the children who attend the school.

And this has been encouraged by a city councilman, Steve Blair, who uses his local radio talk show to rile up these people and demand the mural be destroyed. And now the faces are being painted white, “because of the controversy.” Remember where you were, when you could still laugh about teabaggers and racists and Arizonans, because funny time is almost over. If the unemployment keeps up — one in five adult white males has no job and will never have a job again — and people keep walking away from their stucco heaps they can’t afford and the states and cities and counties and towns keep passing their aggressive racist laws to rile up the trash even more, shit’s going to very soon become very bad, and whether it’s the National Guard having wars in the Sunbelt Exurbs against armies of crazy old white people who are finally using their hundreds of millions of guns, or whole Latino neighborhoods burned to the ground the way the Klan used to burn down black neighborhoods a century ago, we are in for a long dark night and no light-colored paint is going to fix that.

Wonkette via  ewwwitzjojo

Dan Kanstroom, professor of law at Boston College, says that the U.S. is in many ways unique in its treatment of deportation as a totally civil sanction as opposed to a criminal punishment. “In many situations in Europe,” says Kanstroom, “deportation after a person has served their sentence would be considered double jeopardy.” And, he says, “E.U. law holds that the state must consider the crime and the effect of deportation on families and children.”

Yet the U.S. continues to deport parents with criminal convictions without considering the impact on their families. Stories from people around the country expose a harsh reality for families who continue to be separated. Stripped of a major source of income and burdened with the financial strains of legal fees or of remitting money to their deported relatives, families are falling into poverty, even losing homes to foreclosure.

Seth Freed Wessler, Double Punishment

For years in the United States, prisons have been filling up. When inmates are released back to their communities, they face a range of challenges from racial profiling by police to discrimination against people with criminal records. Despite the U.S. Constitution’s prohibition on double jeopardy—being tried and convicted twice for the same crime—incarceration is just the beginning of a barrage of punishments that follow.

For immigrants who enter the criminal justice system, double punishment is a formal part of their legal landscape. While it has been true to some extent since the early part of the 20th century that immigrants convicted of some crimes could face the possibility of deportation after completing their sentences, the passage of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Individual Responsibility Act in 1996 changed this possibility into an airtight conclusion.

Before 1996, immigrants convicted of crimes served their time in prison and then could petition a judge to let them stay in the U.S. In most cases, judges held the power to weigh the many factors in a person’s case, including how long a person had been in the country, if they had partners and children, if they were committed to turning their lives around. The system led to the deportation of tens of thousands of people each year, but for many, relief was available.

In 1996, immigration courts were suddenly stripped of the power to consider a person’s full situation. It no longer mattered that they had children or had been in the U.S. almost all their lives as legal permanent residents. For immigrants found guilty of crime, deportation became the mandatory result of their conviction.

Seth Freed Wessler, Double Punishment
“The growing number of immigration-enforcement bills in state  legislatures around the country are not merely following Arizona’s lead.  Rather, the bills—which legislators have discussed or introduced in at  least 11 states—are the fruits of a concerted political strategy seeded  by the far-right group Federation for American Immigration Reform, which  has taken money from a eugenics foundation and was created by a man who  warned of a “Latin onslaught.””
The Far-Right Movement Behind Arizona Copycat Bills By Seth Freed Wessler

“The growing number of immigration-enforcement bills in state legislatures around the country are not merely following Arizona’s lead. Rather, the bills—which legislators have discussed or introduced in at least 11 states—are the fruits of a concerted political strategy seeded by the far-right group Federation for American Immigration Reform, which has taken money from a eugenics foundation and was created by a man who warned of a “Latin onslaught.””

The Far-Right Movement Behind Arizona Copycat Bills By Seth Freed Wessler

curate:

via altoarizona.com